so just for kicks, you do realize that if a rob and lee pan out to be successful players, your bad mojo theory would be totally out the window, correct?

Not to worry.  He'll find a way to prove he was right regardless.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

This should go in TMD's wall of fame... one of the dumbest things he's ever said and then defended, which is saying a lot actually.  

That would play right into what he craves the most: attention. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

...that flies until top picks like Reggie Williams and Justin Blackmon also flamed out (for various reasons), who both clearly had talent or else they wouldn't have gone in the top half of the first round.

 

Both Lee and Robinson are vastly talented.... poor guys. 

 

And how about R.J. Soward?   I'm sure your qualifier of 'top half of the first round' doesn't qualify him on purpose.  But he was also a first rounder.  But he was 81.


Of our 70 WR's, only 2 so far have panned out.  3 if Shorts gets it, and 6 with Hurns/Lee/Robinson.  That's a 4% success rate so far.  There's absolutely no discrepancy as I've stated.  Our QB play, and WR choices have been our problem.  NOT the numbers.  We haven't had a 1000 yard receiver since Jimmy Smith.  Reggie Williams is our 3rd leading receiver.  That's right.  The guy with one of those low numbers.  After him is another guy with a low number, and after him is ANOTHER guy with a low number.

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

And how about R.J. Soward?   I'm sure your qualifier of 'top half of the first round' doesn't qualify him on purpose.  But he was also a first rounder.  But he was 81.

Of our 70 WR's, only 2 so far have panned out.  3 if Shorts gets it, and 6 with Hurns/Lee/Robinson.  That's a 4% success rate so far.  There's absolutely no discrepancy as I've stated.  Our QB play, and WR choices have been our problem.  NOT the numbers.  We haven't had a 1000 yard receiver since Jimmy Smith.  Reggie Williams is our 3rd leading receiver.  That's right.  The guy with one of those low numbers.  After him is another guy with a low number, and after him is ANOTHER guy with a low number.

I notice he's avoided this thread for a few hours now.  Math must confuse him. 

 

In the end, facts trump the superstitions of one ignorant fan. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

I notice he's avoided this thread for a few hours now.  Math must confuse him. 

 

In the end, facts trump the superstitions of one ignorant fan. 

 

 

I'm fine with math. As a matter of fact I've provided the most iron clad math of the thread.....

 

ZERO Jags WR have been a success that have worn the 10-19 numbers to this point. 

 

Over 10 (allegedly 25) Jags have worn the teen numbers in our existence) 

---

The only good Jaguars' QB we've ever had wore #8. If Bortles doesn't change his number, we're doomed.

---

I'm fine with math. As a matter of fact I've provided the most iron clad math of the thread.....


ZERO Jags WR have been a success that have worn the 10-19 numbers to this point.


Over 10 (allegedly 25) Jags have worn the teen numbers in our existence)

Just curious...what is your definition of success?

---

WR's with low numbers:


1. Ernest Wilford (19)

2. Reggie Williams (11)

3. Matt Jones (18)

4. Mike Sims-Walker (11/15)

5. Justin Blackmon (14)

6. Mike Brown (12)

7. Troy Edwards (18/16)

8. Jimmy Redmond (17/87)

9. Tiquan Underwood (19)

(Below this line only had a single season with the Jags)

10. John Broussard (15)

11. Stephen Burton (15)

12. Toney Clemons (17)

13. Quan Cosby (13)

14. Nate Hughes (16)

15. Jerrell Jackson (18)

16. John Matthews (17)

17. Jamar Newsome (14)

18. Tobais Palmer (13)

19. Taylor Price (15)

20. Denard Robinson (16)

21. Ace Sanders (18)

22. Jordan Shipley (16)

23. Kerry Taylor (13)

24. Chastin West (17)

25. D'Juan Woods (14)



Given that we've had bad Quarterback play... it's not really all that out of the ordinary to not have had much success from our 'low number' receivers.  Especially as we've only had two (so far) successful WR's in the history of our team.  That's a sign that we've been bad at picking WR's (and have never had adequate QB's to throw to them).  

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

Just curious...what is your definition of success?

 

AT the very least - Living up to your draft status for 1st and 2nd day picks...

 

Being a productive, consistent starter for day 3 and below, picks.

 

Or such as in the case of someone like Reggie Barlow - being near the top of the NFL in your specialized area, which for him was punt / kick returns. 

---

I'm fine with math. As a matter of fact I've provided the most iron clad math of the thread.....

 

ZERO Jags WR have been a success that have worn the 10-19 numbers to this point. 

 

Over 10 (allegedly 25) Jags have worn the teen numbers in our existence) 

 

And still, it's idiotic to suggest the jersey numbers have any impact on the players.  But, I have to take into consideration where this is coming from, then it makes sense.  Run, Forrest, run!

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

WR's with low numbers:


1. Ernest Wilford (19)

2. Reggie Williams (11)

3. Matt Jones (18)

4. Mike Sims-Walker (11/15)

5. Justin Blackmon (14)

6. Mike Brown (12)

7. Troy Edwards (18/16)

8. Jimmy Redmond (17/87)

9. Tiquan Underwood (19)

(Below this line only had a single season with the Jags)

10. John Broussard (15)

11. Stephen Burton (15)

12. Toney Clemons (17)

13. Quan Cosby (13)

14. Nate Hughes (16)

15. Jerrell Jackson (18)

16. John Matthews (17)

17. Jamar Newsome (14)

18. Tobais Palmer (13)

19. Taylor Price (15)

20. Denard Robinson (16)

21. Ace Sanders (18)

22. Jordan Shipley (16)

23. Kerry Taylor (13)

24. Chastin West (17)

25. D'Juan Woods (14)



Given that we've had bad Quarterback play... it's not really all that out of the ordinary to not have had much success from our 'low number' receivers.  Especially as we've only had two (so far) successful WR's in the history of our team.  That's a sign that we've been bad at picking WR's (and have never had adequate QB's to throw to them).  

 

No, clearly it's the jersey numbers.  It's got nothing to do with lousy QB play, or marginal receiver talent.  It's all about the numbers. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

No, clearly it's the jersey numbers. It's got nothing to do with lousy QB play, or marginal receiver talent. It's all about the numbers.

There certainly are some household names on that list. Imagine how great Tobais Palmer could have been had he chosen a number in the 80s.

---

There certainly are some household names on that list. Imagine how great Tobais Palmer could have been had he chosen a number in the 80s.

Hall of Fame whiff.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

AT the very least - Living up to your draft status for 1st and 2nd day picks...

 

Being a productive, consistent starter for day 3 and below, picks.

 

Or such as in the case of someone like Reggie Barlow - being near the top of the NFL in your specialized area, which for him was punt / kick returns. 

My definition of success for a day three pick is "make the team." The vast majority of day three picks don't end up as starters, but they're still productive role players and special teamers. Shoot, for an undrafted rookie, my definition of success is "be invited to camp." Stop putting artificially high qualifiers on things.

---

My definition of success for a day three pick is "make the team." The vast majority of day three picks don't end up as starters, but they're still productive role players and special teamers. Shoot, for an undrafted rookie, my definition of success is "be invited to camp." Stop putting artificially high qualifiers on things.

TMD sets high standards for everything but himself. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Psssshhhh. Rod Smith was an undrafted FA and was a 2 time All Pro....and wore #80.



Cant argue science.

---

“Motivation alone is not enough.  If you have an idiot and you motivate him,now you have a motivated idiot.” Jim Rohn

 

Psssshhhh. Rod Smith was an undrafted FA and was a 2 time All Pro....and wore #80.



Cant argue science.

You're right.  We shouldn't challenge such science. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Wait...There's more to this argument. Jerry Rice is the greatest WR EVER while wearing #80. He goes to Denver and wears #19....and gets cut.



#mindBLOWN

---

“Motivation alone is not enough.  If you have an idiot and you motivate him,now you have a motivated idiot.” Jim Rohn

 

Wait...There's more to this argument. Jerry Rice is the greatest WR EVER while wearing #80. He goes to Denver and wears #19....and gets cut.



#mindBLOWN

---

Wait...There's more to this argument. Jerry Rice is the greatest WR EVER while wearing #80. He goes to Denver and wears #19....and gets cut.



#mindBLOWN

Randy Moss...


Vikings - 84

Raiders - 18

Patriots - 81


Hmmm

---