I honestly feel bad for you. The mental gymnastics you inflict upon yourself will eventually have consequences. There is some very funny stuff going on in your anterior cingulate cortex. I'm telling you, it will catch up to you one day.

 

The gift that keeps on giving.


 

Hey leftists, this is what your side looks like!

---

                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"

The gift that keeps on giving.


 

Hey leftists, this is what your side looks like!

Generalization of an entire group is foolish and lame. Or would you say it's fair to say your side looks like Dylan Roof?

 

edit:

You are both doing it.... might have a better discussion without that... maybe.....

---

The gift that keeps on giving.


Hey leftists, this is what your side looks like!

NASA and NOAA and every single national science agency of the G8+5 nations aren't "leftist." You are just too blinded by your own political affiliation to accept the facts as they are presented.


Fox News doesn't report on climate change. They've censored that for you. However, it doesn't make the science leftist if the right doesn't choose to acknowledge it. It just makes the right wrong.


Why do you continue to troll this thread anyways? You've made your points clear: you know better than published scientists, international conspiracy, lizard people, new world order, blah blah, whatever.


Go take a walk. Maybe say hello to your grand kids (while they are still amicable). Find something better to do with your time. You are wasting it here.

---

I feel bad for the poor, poor synapses in your brain. I imagine them sputtering and misfiring left and right like the engine of an old jalopy filled with bad fuel. The cognitive dissonance in your mind just must be detrimental to your mental health. I fear you may stroke out if you aren't careful. Stop projecting and acquiesce. It will soothe the pain. Trust me friend, you are doing yourself no favors.

 

 

I honestly feel bad for you. The mental gymnastics you inflict upon yourself will eventually have consequences. There is some very funny stuff going on in your anterior cingulate cortex. I'm telling you, it will catch up to you one day.

 

 

Generalization of an entire group is foolish and lame. Or would you say it's fair to say your side looks like Dylan Roof?

 

edit:

You are both doing it.... might have a better discussion without that... maybe.....

 

Typical liberal attacks to attempt to discredit or demean someone they don't agree with.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Typical liberal attacks to attempt to discredit or demean someone they don't agree with.

Really.... The sarcasm was lost on you there?

 

You must be tired because I know you are smarter than that. 

---

Generalization of an entire group is foolish and lame. Or would you say it's fair to say your side looks like Dylan Roof?


edit:

You are both doing it.... might have a better discussion without that... maybe.....

I can't help the facts. The indisputable fact is the right won't accept the scientific consensus on the issue of climate change. If they did, I wouldn't take umbrage with them. Simply stated.

---

Really.... The sarcasm was lost on you there?

 

You must be tired because I know you are smarter than that. 

Actually, yes I am tired.  I quoted the wrong post when I quoted yours.  It's about time for me to go do some reading and settle down for the evening.  I'm on a 12 day work week this week.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Generalization of an entire group is foolish and lame. Or would you say it's fair to say your side looks like Dylan Roof?

 

edit:

You are both doing it.... might have a better discussion without that... maybe.....

 

Are you comparing Oface to Dylan Roof?


 

My intention in that statement was to start a discussion by the left wingers here as to whether or not his kind of rhetoric was deemed acceptable by the left. Is that what the left considers a valid argument? Do you find his ad hominem arguments convincing?

---

                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"

Are you comparing Oface to Dylan Roof?


My intention in that statement was to start a discussion by the left wingers here as to whether or not his kind of rhetoric was deemed acceptable by the left. Is that what the left considers a valid argument? Do you find his ad hominem arguments convincing?

Believe it or not, it's not an ad hominem attack to point out your one and only 'source' is an unqualified hack and paid shill. It's not like he has any actual science to back up his 'argument.'

---

Are you comparing Oface to Dylan Roof?


 

My intention in that statement was to start a discussion by the left wingers here as to whether or not his kind of rhetoric was deemed acceptable by the left. Is that what the left considers a valid argument? Do you find his ad hominem arguments convincing?

I said you are both generalizing but I guess you missed that.

 

Making sweeping generalized statements doesn't start conversation, that was kind of the whole point there. You both are guilty of that. 

 

Based on that and your question above, by the power vested in my the lefty something or other I denounce you both for tomfoolery, shenaginans etc..etc...

---

I said you are both generalizing but I guess you missed that.


Making sweeping generalized statements doesn't start conversation, that was kind of the whole point there. You both are guilty of that.


Based on that and your question above, by the power vested in my the lefty something or other I denounce you both for tomfoolery, shenaginans etc..etc...

I'm not making any generalizations.

---

I said you are both generalizing but I guess you missed that.

 

Making sweeping generalized statements doesn't start conversation, that was kind of the whole point there. You both are guilty of that. 

 

Based on that and your question above, by the power vested in my the lefty something or other I denounce you both for tomfoolery, shenaginans etc..etc...

 

So let me generalize again. Based on your non-response to my question (+ Hillary Clinton), I hereby deem that all leftists refuse to answer any questions not posed by their chosen flunkies.


 

And by this I mean, please tell us what you think of Oface's arguments.

---

                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"

So let me generalize again. Based on your non-response to my question (+ Hillary Clinton), I hereby deem that all leftists refuse to answer any questions not posed by their chosen flunkies.


 

And by this I mean, please tell us what you think of Oface's arguments.

Some of his arguments are sound and some are abrasive and personal like a lot of people's on here. Regardless, what does it matter what I think? 

 

None of this changes what I think about this topic nor is it really relevant. My only point was to say maybe you guys could have some better dialogue. Obviously that was a mistake. 

---

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/22/opinions/c...ge-denial/

---

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/22/opinions/c...ge-denial/

 

Thanks. Love the comments.

---

                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"

Some of his arguments are sound and some are abrasive and personal like a lot of people's on here. Regardless, what does it matter what I think? 

 

None of this changes what I think about this topic nor is it really relevant. My only point was to say maybe you guys could have some better dialogue. Obviously that was a mistake. 

 

I have repeatedly posted scientific arguments filled with actual data as to why CO2 is not a problem.


 

The philosopher has posted links to newspaper and magazine articles by reporters and commentators who don't understand the science, ad hom attacks, and appeals to authority. I really want to know what school of philosophy taught him those techniques.

---

                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"

I have repeatedly posted scientific arguments filled with actual data as to why CO2 is not a problem.


 

The philosopher has posted links to newspaper and magazine articles by reporters and commentators who don't understand the science, ad hom attacks, and appeals to authority. I really want to know what school of philosophy taught him those techniques.

 

And now you are appealing to me?  :thumbsup:

 

I should have stayed out of this thread. 

---

RIDICOLOUS: Arctic Global Warming Expedition Stopped Because of too Much Ice
 

A research expedition to study the effects of global warming aboard the Canadian Coast Guard icebreaker Amundsen is on hold as the icebreaker is needed to do it’s primary job — break up ice.

 

According to a Coast Guard officer, the icy conditions are the “worst he’s seen in 20 years“:

 

http://conservativepost.com/ridicolous-a...-much-ice/

---

RIDICOLOUS: Arctic Global Warming Expedition Stopped Because of too Much Ice

 

A research expedition to study the effects of global warming aboard the Canadian Coast Guard icebreaker Amundsen is on hold as the icebreaker is needed to do it’s primary job — break up ice.

 

According to a Coast Guard officer, the icy conditions are the “worst he’s seen in 20 years“:

 

http://conservativepost.com/ridicolous-a...-much-ice/

 

 

So outraged they can't even spell.  :thumbsup:

---

I have repeatedly posted scientific arguments filled with actual data as to why CO2 is not a problem.


 
The philosopher has posted links to newspaper and magazine articles by reporters and commentators who don't understand the science, ad hom attacks, and appeals to authority. I really want to know what school of philosophy taught him those techniques.

I wonder what you"ll do once the insurance companies finally come down on the RNC. When the republicans finally acquiesce, will you roll over and accept your failings as a person? Will your head explode? The truth shall set you free (or explode your brain possibly in your case). Cling to your blogs and your out of context graphs, your ironic name-calling, your hubris, your conspiracy theories for as long as you like. You only stand to make yourself out the fool.

---