Turtleface just wants Hill-dawg to make the choice.

And when she nominates Obama, their collective heads explode.

---

Only a chump boos the home team!

As I stated before, it is President Obama's duty under The Constitution to nominate a replacement.  That replacement needs to be rational and vetted by The Senate in order to go through.  Some people have floated the idea of Joe Biden, Hillary and Hillary nominating Obama.  None of those ideas are rational, and they should be blocked by The Senate.

 

A Supreme Court nomination should not be a partisan politician.  It should be someone knowledgeable about constitutional law.  It should be someone with a history of siding on both the left and the right side of political issues.

 

If the court had 9 "Justice Kennedy's" that would be ideal.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

McConnell doubles down on his obstructionist dynasty and vows to make the SCOTUS replacement a "next president" issue. Way to wipe your butt with the Constitution. Tell me again how this is acceptable behavior or remotely patriotic in any way?

Google joe biden rule 1992 and holla at me.

---

As I stated before, it is President Obama's duty under The Constitution to nominate a replacement. That replacement needs to be rational and vetted by The Senate in order to go through. Some people have floated the idea of Joe Biden, Hillary and Hillary nominating Obama. None of those ideas are rational, and they should be blocked by The Senate.


A Supreme Court nomination should not be a partisan politician. It should be someone knowledgeable about constitutional law. It should be someone with a history of siding on both the left and the right side of political issues.


If the court had 9 "Justice Kennedy's" that would be ideal.

Making up hearts stars and unicorns and calling it equal protection? Ill pass.

---

As I stated before, it is President Obama's duty under The Constitution to nominate a replacement.  That replacement needs to be rational and vetted by The Senate in order to go through.  Some people have floated the idea of Joe Biden, Hillary and Hillary nominating Obama.  None of those ideas are rational, and they should be blocked by The Senate.

 

A Supreme Court nomination should not be a partisan politician.  It should be someone knowledgeable about constitutional law.  It should be someone with a history of siding on both the left and the right side of political issues.

 

If the court had 9 "Justice Kennedy's" that would be ideal.

What do you think about Sri Srinivasan?

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

What do you think about Sri Srinivasan?

 

Honestly, I would have to do some more research.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

I want to see that nomination just to see anyone talk down a prior 93-0, for one.

---

Obama is not only the worst President in US History, he's a Petty immature child.  He should've attended the funeral.

---

Google joe biden rule 1992 and holla at me.

He made comments which have no bearing on the process as it has stood for hundreds of years. Waiting almost a year is unacceptable per the [BLEEP] Constitution.


Holla.

---

Only a chump boos the home team!

Obama is not only the worst President in US History, he's a Petty immature child. He should've attended the funeral.

Worst by what standards besides your opinion?


Unemployment? GDP? Deficit? S&P? Quantify your statement.

---

Only a chump boos the home team!

He made comments which have no bearing on the process as it has stood for hundreds of years. Waiting almost a year is unacceptable per the [BAD WORD REMOVED] Constitution.


Holla.

Lol. The sitting vp had the exact same stance about election year appointments in 92 just like his party in 60 just like that same party in 07 and you CANT see that correlation


Yet somehow you magically see a timetable set forth in constitution that doesnt exist?


Let me guess... Summer home in colorado right.

---

Obama is not only the worst President in US History, he's a Petty immature child.  He should've attended the funeral.

 

He's most certainly not the worst President in US History.  And he shouldn't have attended the funeral.  It's not unprecedented for Presidents to not attend funerals of Supreme Court Justices.  He paid his respects.  There's no reason he needed to attend the funeral.  It's a ridiculous thing to attack him over.  What would him going have changed?

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

Lol. The sitting vp had the exact same stance about election year appointments in 92 just like his party in 60 just like that same party in 07 and you CANT see that correlation


Yet somehow you magically see a timetable set forth in constitution that doesnt exist?


Let me guess... Summer home in colorado right.

Who gives a hoot what he said?! Look at what the government did. Their [BLEEP] job.


DO YOUR JOB!

---

Only a chump boos the home team!

Its not their job to rubber stamp his pick. It is their job based on the seperation of powers to fight for the role of the legislature if infringed upon by executive fiat, as it has been.

---

Its not their job to rubber stamp his pick. It is their job based on the seperation of powers to fight for the role of the legislature if infringed upon by executive fiat, as it has been.

It's their job to vet his nomination.

---

Only a chump boos the home team!

Obama is not only the worst President in US History, he's a Petty immature child.  He should've attended the funeral.

 

 

Worst by what standards besides your opinion?


Unemployment? GDP? Deficit? S&P? Quantify your statement.

 

Dewit, I'm afraid Kotite's right.  All BHO has to do is hold up his hand and point, saying "scoreboard".

---

Dewit, I'm afraid Kotite's right.  All BHO has to do is hold up his hand and point, saying "scoreboard".

 

Here you go:

 

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Here you go:

 

We'll overcome W's legacy in time.

 

For now, I'll take the 5% unemployment, sub $2 gas, strong dollar, the respect of the free world, and 2 less wars.

---

We'll overcome W's legacy in time.

 

For now, I'll take the 5% unemployment, sub $2 gas, strong dollar, the respect of the free world, and 2 less wars.

 

If you think that those things are happening now (aside from the gas which is more to do with OPEC's response to the Shale boom than anything Obama did) then you're clearly in over your head.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

We'll overcome W's legacy in time.


For now, I'll take the 5% unemployment, sub $2 gas, strong dollar, the respect of the free world, and 2 less wars.

1.) thats because in our current system if you give up looking for work run out of unemployment benefits and go live under a bridge your counted as being fully employed (lowest workforce paticiption rate since carter)


2.) thats because of fracking, increased production by opec to drive down our incrntive to increase our own capabilities to supply, and an economy that has lacked real increase in consumer demand.


3.) we doubled the national debt and monetized even more through quantative easing.


4.) if you forefit a game it ends... Thats not the same as winning

---