Expect the 2017 Jags to win enough to miss out on the better QB prospects next year. #becausejaguars

Can always trade up

---

He couldn't even beat out Marquise Williams. Started 13 games and went 8-5, no thank you. He's only getting top 10 consideration for one reason.

---

No.

---

I'd literally prefer Deshaun Watson at 4 over Fournette. I'd even take O.J. Howard over Fournette, although I know that's not likely to be agreed upon much.


I'm ok with Thomas or Allen, but I'll be a bit naturally upset if we end up with a safety or RB at 4. I'd rather take a chance on the QB. Blake's mechanics are never gonna be what they need to be.

---

I don't think it needs to be said, but "better than RB at 4" is not even close to an endorsement of QB at 4 either. 

---

I'd literally prefer Deshaun Watson at 4 over Fournette. I'd even take O.J. Howard over Fournette, although I know that's not likely to be agreed upon much.


I'm ok with Thomas or Allen, but I'll be a bit naturally upset if we end up with a safety or RB at 4. I'd rather take a chance on the QB. Blake's mechanics are never gonna be what they need to be.

TE at 4 >>> RB at 4. 

---

I'd literally prefer Deshaun Watson at 4 over Fournette. I'd even take O.J. Howard over Fournette, although I know that's not likely to be agreed upon much.


I'm ok with Thomas or Allen, but I'll be a bit naturally upset if we end up with a safety or RB at 4. I'd rather take a chance on the QB. Blake's mechanics are never gonna be what they need to be.

So you'd be upset if they took Adams but okay if they took Tribusky?  Have you watched both of these guys play?  Not being an jerk, just asking.

---

Hmm. OJ Howard at 4? I'm not sure if I'd be mad about it. Just doesn't seem like good value. I don't think a TE has ever been taken Top 5.

---

Hmm. OJ Howard at 4? I'm not sure if I'd be mad about it. Just doesn't seem like good value. I don't think a TE has ever been taken Top 5.

Winslow and Davis were taken 6th.

 

I'd be very upset with a TE at 4. This draft is loaded at TE and RB. Don't take either one at 4.

---

So you'd be upset if they took Adams but okay if they took Tribusky? Have you watched both of these guys play? Not being an jerk, just asking.

I'll admit that I don't watch much college ball. This is more about me wanting a QB than it is about Trubisky. I should've been more clear.

---

Winslow and Davis were taken 6th.


I'd be very upset with a TE at 4. This draft is loaded at TE and RB. Don't take either one at 4.

I honestly hope we aren't picking at 4. Trade back please.

---

We need Sam Darnold. The only way we can get him is getting the #1 pick, because any team picking first next year that needs a QB would be insane to trade out of that spot. The best way to get the #1 pick is to let Biff Bortles throw wobblers and pick 6s like he always does for one more year.

---

Make the Jags Great Again
Blake Bortles......YOU'RE FIRED!
Dave Caldwell.....YOU'RE FIRED!

I'll admit that I don't watch much college ball. This is more about me wanting a QB than it is about Trubisky. I should've been more clear.

Gotcha, no worries.


IMO, Adams is head and shoulders above any QB prospect in this draft.  Given the need at SS for the moment, he'd be a great pick.

---

I honestly hope we aren't picking at 4. Trade back please.

This I'll definitely agree with. Basically, I think if we stay at 4 the value is going to be muddied regardless. Allen has injury issues and Garrett will be gone. There's no way to tell the future, but aside from Solomon Thomas or a potential signal caller, I don't think there's going to be a value pick for us like we had last year with Ramsey.


He'll idk, I just don't believe in Blake at all, and I think we're gonna win enough games-despite him-to screw up our chances at getting another QB in the top 5.


I do understand it would be a mistake to force a QB, but if the browns are allegedly discussing Trubisky at 1, the Jags should be discussing him at 4.


Definitely rather have any QB over any available RB or safety in the 1st round, even if it's a total crap shoot.


Solomon Thomas would be my choice if no QB. Fwiw.

---

Gotcha, no worries.

IMO, Adams is head and shoulders above any QB prospect in this draft. Given the need at SS for the moment, he'd be a great pick.

You're good people, I know you're not ripping me, and I know this isn't popular opinion.


I personally would rather they gamble on any of the QBs that are deemed potential franchise guys over Adams. That's how little I think of Blake's chances and how important the QB position is to me. I'd be very upset if they draft any RB or S without trading back.


Honestly, I'm off the John Allen bandwagon after his combine and medical issues. Aside from Thomas, I don't think anyone is going to scream value at 4. That being the case, give me the QB. I think one of them could flourish with a year to learn here.

---

I still feel like the best possible qb solution would be Mahones falling to #35.

---

'02

I'd rather trade down and try and pick up an additonal 1st for next year.

---

Can always trade up

I dont see any team thats gonna end up at the top that already has their qb. I imagine its gonna be the Jets and 9ers.

---

TE at 4 >>> RB at 4. 

 

Both are better than S at 4.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Both are better than S at 4.

 

Not in this draft

---

'02