TRUMP: “Everybody's got to be covered. This is an un-Republican thing for me to say because a lot of times they say, 'No, no, the lower 25 percent that can't afford private. But—'”

PELLEY: “Universal health care.”

TRUMP: “I am going to take care of everybody. I don't care if it costs me votes or not. Everybody's going to be taken care of much better than they're taken care of now.”

PELLEY: “The uninsured person is going to be taken care of. How? How?”

TRUMP: “They're going to be taken care of. I would make a deal with existing hospitals to take care of people. And, you know what, if this is probably—”

PELLEY: “Make a deal? Who pays for it?”

TRUMP: —the government's gonna pay for it. But we're going to save so much money on the other side. But for the most it's going to be a private plan and people are going to be able to go out and negotiate great plans with lots of different competition with lots of competitors with great companies and they can have their doctors, they can have plans, they can have everything.

 

Source

---

If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley


 

If it sucks because Republicans watered it down. Obamacare should have had a public option
.
Democrats will introduce single payer
when the American public has proof this market based healthcare system is a failed experiment. It won't work and it never will work.

Yes it should have. They didn't do it in 2009 with the super-majority. They talked about it all the time and didn't do it. It would be a very simple solution, but they didn't make it happen (proving that the parties are really not that different).

 

Single payer would kill our research overnight. No need to worry tho, it won't happen either.

---

Yes, it's improvement, but it's Blaine Gabbert 2012 level improvement. - Pirkster

http://youtu.be/ouGM3NWpjxk The Home Hypnotist!

http://youtu.be/XQRFkn0Ly3A Media on the Brain Link!
 

Peyton must store oxygen in that forehead of his. No way I'd still be alive after all that choking.

 

One question that hasn't been addressed is will we be required to to use the health care our company provides or will we be able to choose our own? I realize that would mean we we would have to pay the entire premium ourselves, but our companies health care company sucks [BLEEP]...I'm not sure if we are able to get rid of it next year or have to wait for the following year..I can't remember when our Union contract was ratified which included this crappy coverage...

---

One question that hasn't been addressed is will we be required to to use the health care our company provides or will we be able to choose our own? I realize that would mean we we would have to pay the entire premium ourselves, but our companies health care company sucks [BAD WORD REMOVED]...I'm not sure if we are able to get rid of it next year or have to wait for the following year..I can't remember when our Union contract was ratified which included this crappy coverage...

 

You have that option right now and I don't see it changing.  Companies shouldn't be required to offer health coverage to begin with.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

You have that option right now and I don't see it changing.  Companies shouldn't be required to offer health coverage to begin with.

They call it a "benefit" because the employer pays most of the premium..Employers started making health care part of a company's benefit package so therefor it became the standard 

---

They call it a "benefit" because the employer pays most of the premium..Employers started making health care part of a company's benefit package so therefor it became the standard 

 

Regarding the part in bold, why is that?

 

Either way, employers should not be required to offer health insurance, just like they aren't required to offer a retirement savings plan.  It all goes back to personal responsibility.

 

By the same token, having health insurance should not be mandatory by law.  It should be a personal choice.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Regarding the part in bold, why is that?

 

Either way, employers should not be required to offer health insurance, just like they aren't required to offer a retirement savings plan.  It all goes back to personal responsibility.

 

By the same token, having health insurance should not be mandatory by law.  It should be a personal choice.

To attract workers...Benefits are a huge part of why people take jobs, the more/better benefits you have, the better chance you have to retain employees rather than high turn over....

 

Most people are not self disciplined enough to save for retirement...It would end up costing the government a [BLEEP] pot full of money to support all of those who failed to save enough for retirement...The same goes for health insurance, most people can't afford it without the employer paying their part of it... 

---

Regarding the part in bold, why is that?

 

Either way, employers should not be required to offer health insurance, just like they aren't required to offer a retirement savings plan.  It all goes back to personal responsibility.

 

By the same token, having health insurance should not be mandatory by law.  It should be a personal choice.

 

Employers offering health insurance as a benefit started in World War II. Companies were unable to increase wages (wage and price controls) so they offered health care as an enticement.

 

Having health insurance will/needs to be mandatory. Otherwise you'll never have enough healthy people paying to support the sick people. Which is why we're heading down the road to a single payer system. People who call themselves conservative will kick and scream, but there really is no better system as an alternative, at least that I'm aware of, in the advanced industrialized world. Insurance companies aren't about to cover sick people, old people, and especially old sick people unless they are assured of receiving funds from healthy young people. Or the government.

 

And that's what Donald Trump, in his incoherent, bumbling way, was getting at in the above 60 minutes quote. He's right.

---

The sun's not yellow, it's chicken.

To attract workers...Benefits are a huge part of why people take jobs, the more/better benefits you have, the better chance you have to retain employees rather than high turn over....

 

Most people are not self disciplined enough to save for retirement...It would end up costing the government a [BAD WORD REMOVED] pot full of money to support all of those who failed to save enough for retirement...The same goes for health insurance, most people can't afford it without the employer paying their part of it... 

 

You are mostly right, but the real answer stems from government over-reach way back in the 1940's.  This explains it in simple terms.

 

You're absolutely right in the fact that most people are not self disciplined enough to save for retirement.  However, that's a culture problem, not a government problem.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Employers offering health insurance as a benefit started in World War II. Companies were unable to increase wages (wage and price controls) so they offered health care as an enticement.

 

Having health insurance will/needs to be mandatory. Otherwise you'll never have enough healthy people paying to support the sick people. Which is why we're heading down the road to a single payer system. People who call themselves conservative will kick and scream, but there really is no better system as an alternative, at least that I'm aware of, in the advanced industrialized world. Insurance companies aren't about to cover sick people, old people, and especially old sick people unless they are assured of receiving funds from healthy young people. Or the government.

 

And that's what Donald Trump, in his incoherent, bumbling way, was getting at in the above 60 minutes quote. He's right.

 

Why does health insurance need to be mandatory?  Why should it be up to employers and/or the government to manage/pay for it?  Where is personal responsibility in all of this?

 

The same should be said about Social Security.  It's not the government's job to manage and/or provide a retirement plan.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

You are mostly right, but the real answer stems from government over-reach way back in the 1940's.  This explains it in simple terms.

 

You're absolutely right in the fact that most people are not self disciplined enough to save for retirement.  However, that's a culture problem, not a government problem.

Once employers started providing health care it became something that will never go away...Health care is much too expensive for people to afford on their own and if employers start removing health care as a benefit, it's going to hurt employee retention...Companies cutting benefits will discourage longevity in the work place...

 

The culture problem becomes a government problem when the government has to expand public assistance and subsidies to accommodate for uninsured persons with health problems and unable to meet their financial and housing needs...  

---

However, the government confiscating 12% of your income makes it difficult for the average person to afford retirement savings.

---

Why does health insurance need to be mandatory?  Why should it be up to employers and/or the government to manage/pay for it?  Where is personal responsibility in all of this?

 

The same should be said about Social Security.  It's not the government's job to manage and/or provide a retirement plan.

Because people can not afford quality health care out of their own pocket...Have you looked at the policies from the ACA? The deductibles are outrageous and the premiums are NOT affordable 

---

However, the government confiscating 12% of your income makes it difficult for the average person to afford retirement savings.

another good point...I currently put aside 7% of my gross income per week towards retirement and I've read financial experts are saying everyone should put aside at least 10%...

---

Once employers started providing health care it became something that will never go away...Health care is much too expensive for people to afford on their own and if employers start removing health care as a benefit, it's going to hurt employee retention...Companies cutting benefits will discourage longevity in the work place...

 

The culture problem becomes a government problem when the government has to expand public assistance and subsidies to accommodate for uninsured persons with health problems and unable to meet their financial and housing needs...  

 

Not true.  I have had employers give me a choice.  Either they pay for health insurance under the plan that they negotiated, or pay me a higher salary.  The fact of the matter is, people in general are lazy and want someone else to do their shopping for them.

 

Case in point.  My wife and I both worked for the same company that offered a "health benefit".  It was too expensive so we both opted out and got a higher salary.  We shopped around and found a plan that suited our needs for less money than it would have cost us by accepting the "health benefit" offered by the employer.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Not true.  I have had employers give me a choice.  Either they pay for health insurance under the plan that they negotiated, or pay me a higher salary.  The fact of the matter is, people in general are lazy and want someone else to do their shopping for them.

 

Case in point.  My wife and I both worked for the same company that offered a "health benefit".  It was too expensive so we both opted out and got a higher salary.  We shopped around and found a plan that suited our needs for less money than it would have cost us by accepting the "health benefit" offered by the employer.

and when was that? try that today...$400 a month will get you a $5000 deductible and 20% coinsurance if you're lucky

---

Not true.  I have had employers give me a choice.  Either they pay for health insurance under the plan that they negotiated, or pay me a higher salary.  The fact of the matter is, people in general are lazy and want someone else to do their shopping for them.

 

Case in point.  My wife and I both worked for the same company that offered a "health benefit".  It was too expensive so we both opted out and got a higher salary.  We shopped around and found a plan that suited our needs for less money than it would have cost us by accepting the "health benefit" offered by the employer.

not to mention there are damm few employers who give you that choice...very few people can afford health insurance out of their own pocket

---

not to mention there are damm few employers who give you that choice...very few people can afford health insurance out of their own pocket

 

On the contrary, a vast majority can afford it.  Take a look at what people pay for a cell phone and a plan to go along with it.  Most of them buy cell phone insurance on top of it.  It's all a matter of perspective and priority.  Is the newest iPhone with unlimited data and insurance more important than health insurance?

 

Another case in point.  There is a woman that works in our building as a janitor.  She has the latest "smart phone" that she is constantly on.  She posts regularly to social media sites, plays games, etc.  She even bragged about her "unlimited data plan" when she got it.  She was diagnosed with breast cancer and was then "complaining" on social media that she couldn't afford insurance and couldn't afford to take time off of work in order to undergo treatment.

 

The company in turn bent over backwards in order to hold her position while she underwent treatment paid for by medicaid.  She was sure to "update her status" on social media and had her "smart phone" with her throughout the treatment process.  Meanwhile you (assuming that you actually pay taxes) and I paid for her treatment.

 

We're not talking about a "young woman" in her 20's or 30's, we're talking about a women in her upper 40's (single mom, etc.).  If she's that irresponsible regarding her health, she's probably pretty irresponsible when it comes to retirement.

 

My point is though, she could have gotten by with a simple phone rather than a "smart phone" and had some money to pay for health insurance.  I can't honestly say for sure, but I'll bet that she probably has cable/satellite television in her home as well.

 

Take a look at your own television/cell phone expense and tell me that it's not enough to pay for health insurance.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

On the contrary, a vast majority can afford it.  Take a look at what people pay for a cell phone and a plan to go along with it.  Most of them buy cell phone insurance on top of it.  It's all a matter of perspective and priority.  Is the newest iPhone with unlimited data and insurance more important than health insurance?

 

Another case in point.  There is a woman that works in our building as a janitor.  She has the latest "smart phone" that she is constantly on.  She posts regularly to social media sites, plays games, etc.  She even bragged about her "unlimited data plan" when she got it.  She was diagnosed with breast cancer and was then "complaining" on social media that she couldn't afford insurance and couldn't afford to take time off of work in order to undergo treatment.

 

The company in turn bent over backwards in order to hold her position while she underwent treatment paid for by medicaid.  She was sure to "update her status" on social media and had her "smart phone" with her throughout the treatment process.  Meanwhile you (assuming that you actually pay taxes) and I paid for her treatment.

 

We're not talking about a "young woman" in her 20's or 30's, we're talking about a women in her upper 40's (single mom, etc.).  If she's that irresponsible regarding her health, she's probably pretty irresponsible when it comes to retirement.

 

My point is though, she could have gotten by with a simple phone rather than a "smart phone" and had some money to pay for health insurance.  I can't honestly say for sure, but I'll bet that she probably has cable/satellite television in her home as well.

 

Take a look at your own television/cell phone expense and tell me that it's not enough to pay for health insurance.

one month of a cell phone plan is about $40-$50 thats not even comparable to what a health care plan is...I pay 11% of my total premium per year which is $2444 for just my 11%...Thats not even in the same ball park as your example...I don't think you know how expensive health care really is...quality health care plans are pricey unless you want high deductibles and co insurance

 

No one buys anything other than a smart phone...not sure they even make phones that are not smart phones anymore

---

just a quick quote:

 

$351.49 monthly   $2500 deductible 30% co insurance $7500 max out of pocket

 

$129.05 monthly    $5000 deductible 20% coinsurance $9000 max out of pocket

 

there were many more listed but all around the same figures...I did a quick web search and clicked on a link for $9 a week starting price from capitol blue cross and this is what you get from about 10 different companies

---