(07-13-2017, 01:34 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:

(07-13-2017, 12:37 PM)boudreaumw Wrote: Of course they believe it. Dur Fuhrer just said it. So now it's the rabble's talking point.

Like your own?

Ie RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIARUSSIA RUSSIA!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Lol. And you wonder why people think the leftmsmdemocrats are unhinged loonies.

My own what exactly? I'll wait while you figure out how to project even more.

---

(07-12-2017, 02:42 PM)jagibelieve Wrote:

(07-12-2017, 11:14 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: Jesus.  Can we at least stipulate to the following facts?  

Trump Jr got an email that said in part:  

"This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump,"

And Trump Jr replied:

"If it's what you say I love it,"

And then he forwarded the email to Kushner and Manafort and the three of them later  attended the meeting in Trump Tower with a Russian woman lawyer who they had been told had information on Hillary Clinton.   

This isn't something I'm making up.   This is Trump Jr's account of what happened.   Where's the 7 that you say I am adding?

Who did Trump Jr get the email message from?

Where was the Russian government ever involved?

Look closely how CNN "reports" this.

Quote:The younger Trump is a key player in the controversy over Russia's meddling in the 2016 election. According to emails released by Trump Jr., he met on June 9, 2016 with Natalia Veselnitskaya, a lawyer who was described to him as an emissary of the Russian government with information that was part of the country's effort to help elect his father.

Regarding the first part in bold, this really has nothing to do with "collusion", the hacking of the DNC or any Russian government "meddling" in the election.

Answer my first question above regarding the second part in bold.  Since a publicist (former tabloid "journalist") says in an email that the person is an "emissary of the Russian government" does it make it true?

Look at the New York Times headline story today where they clearly published false facts.  Here is the second paragraph from the article.

Quote:As Air Force One jetted back from Europe on Saturday, a small cadre of Mr. Trump’s advisers huddled in a cabin helping to craft a statement for the president’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., to give to The New York Times explaining why he met last summer with a lawyer connected to the Russian government. Participants on the plane and back in the United States debated how transparent to be in the statement, according to people familiar with the discussions.

Note how they attribute this to "people familiar with the discussions".

Fake News

Notice how you refuse to identify yourself? 

Fake Person.


I think my favorite part about this fake news frothy fervor you all have now, is you try to pretend to be and sound smart but then pretend you don't understand a thing about journalistic sourcing and anonymity all the while voting a guy into office who's favorite phrase is some variation of "many people are saying". 

The lack of self awareness is astounding.

---