(07-27-2017, 07:27 AM)SeldomRite Wrote:

(07-27-2017, 07:12 AM)Bullseye Wrote: The thing that gives me hope is how Robinson performed against top pass rushers.  He held up well against Garrett, Lawson from Clemson, Lawson (?) from Auburn, and Key, among others.  Tennessee's Barnett is the only one to leap to mind that had success against him.

Question: Suppose Albert and Robinson compete to a draw at LT.

Who do you start at that position and why?

---

When I initially replied to your post, the relevance of your avatar did not register with me.

Did you watch much Ohio football?  If so, I readily defer to your analysis at this point.  What did you think of Brown?

If the rookie is as good as the vet then you cut the vet and use the salary savings to sign ARob and Telvin. To their new contacts in this season.

That thought crossed my mind as well, though I cringe at the idea of letting a good vet like Albert go, especially if he can still play at a high level.

It seems pretty much a foregone conclusion that Lee will walk via free agency.

Should it be?

The consensus was that Westbrook, from a purely talent standpoint, carried a second round grade, but he dropped due to character concerns.

The Jaguars thought enough about his talent to risk drafting him in the 4th, but came out more strongly that he was on a very short leash than I've ever seen a team take on a player they just drafted.

If you let Lee walk with the idea that Westbrook will step in for him, what happens if Westbrook falters either on or off field?

Does a position of strength suddenly become one of perilously thin depth overnight?

I'm just not sure I let Lee walk, either.

What would Westbrook have to show you this camp to give you the confidence to let Lee walk?

---