(08-22-2017, 09:49 AM)B2hibry Wrote:

(08-22-2017, 03:12 AM)JackCity Wrote: So you think Gabbert actually beat him out in camp?

Not "think", he was in fact benched for Gabbert. Did you see Kaep play before benching? It was embarrassingly bad. He was beat out, then had several surgeries that kept him from seeing the field again. The 49ers tried to release him but couldn't because of the NFL rule that states those recovering from injury can't be released before April 1. Kaep requested a trade shortly after. Guess what, no takers. And here we are once again...Kaep has no takers. Many football sites to include PFF had Kaep ranked at the bottom of QB rankings. Face it; the dude is just not good or remotely consistent QB. To have just a bit of success, the system must be built around him, and frankly, it doesn't take long to burst that bubble.

That's not in camp though. He wasn't allowed play due to the injury clause, once that was taken out he played. Yes he was benched for a game, he was also far better than Gabbert and played with almost nobody on offense to help him.  

We out here using PFF as a standard for QB rankings now? Kap isn't s too 10 QB or anything , the point is that he's good enough and better than what we have in the roster.  As for the systems stuff that's way overblown. The passing offense he's played in was a pretty standard WCO with checks and reads just like we have. Difference being that with Kap you run more RPOs due to his legs and he's elite when throwing on the move, doesn't turn the ball and can still take the big shots downfield. That's better than what we have.

---