(08-23-2017, 12:06 PM)JackCity Wrote:

(08-23-2017, 10:52 AM)B2hibry Wrote: Kaep's agent? You're delusional. No matter what site you prefer, he was ranked lower half of league with exception to his one "good" year. The fact you're justifying what you see in preseason as the scheme perfect for this guy is laughable. If preseason is gold standard, then we should bring league leading passer Gabbert back. Yuck. Also, the legs thing is overrated unless you have trouble reading defenses or o-line sucks, then it's all you got. Sound familiar. The idea is to upgrade the roster and Kaep is not an upgrade, just another Blake.

FYI...you should really look into Kaeps contract details and injury situation before continuing to claim he wasn't benched.

1) Not sure where I mentioned anything about preseason play. Might want to have another read through.

2) Having a mobile QB can help alleviate a bad Oline and can help turn the defense on itself. It's a nice trait to have to keep a defense chugging along. 

3) Read what I wrote bubba. "That's not in camp though. He wasn't allowed play due to the injury clause, once that was taken out he played. Yes he was benched for a game"   

He was benched yes. I'm telling you Gabbert started the year ahead of Kap due to the injury clause. Look it up. Once the injury clause was removed, Kap started back at QB.