(09-06-2017, 09:53 PM)B2hibry Wrote:

(09-06-2017, 06:31 PM)rollerjag Wrote: I didn't say we gave them to them, I said Rumsfeld helped them get them. We knew those sites were hot but didn't warn the personnel who found them, another reason the Bush administration didn't laud their discovery. They weren't part of an on-going program.

Are you trying to tell me if the chemical weapons found in Iraq were the smoking gun which justified the war the Bush War Pigs wouldn't stage a Mission Accomplished-style event to trumpet their discovery?

You dizzy yet? They existed from day one but that fact gets buried by politicians. War came about because Iraq refused to stop making them and destroy what they had stockpiled. What's so hard here? 
Plenty of information out there to educate yourself but I'm sure it's easier to just go with your status quo.

Dizzy? From the truth? The status quo would be there were no weapons found. The truth is old, degraded pre-Gulf War era weapons were found, not products of an active program. The administration didn't laud their discovery because they did not provide justification for the war. Not only that, they knew the weapons existed but were negligent in properly preparing military personnel for their discovery, leading to injury. Your documents will show exactly that.

---