The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Changes i would make
|
(10-04-2017, 03:28 PM)Frailbones Wrote:(10-04-2017, 03:06 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: So Tom Coughlin gambled on the possibility Blake Bortles will not get hurt this season. If that is what he was thinking, it would have made more sense to simply not pick up the fifth-year option because that way knows we will not be on the hook for those $18 million.Yes. The media was not the least bit surprised. According to NFL.com, it was a no-brainer for financial reasons. The idea was don't franchise tag him for his fifth season, which would cost a lot more than $18 million. Only after Chad Henne started a preseason game did anyone (ironically David Carr) say Blake Bortles should be cut instead of play on the option in 2018. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.