(10-08-2017, 09:13 AM)MalabarJag Wrote:

(10-07-2017, 11:44 PM)rollerjag Wrote: I'm saying all we know is she was fired. You are arriving at a conclusion based on bias, not facts. Do you not see the irony?

We also know what she said to get fired.

My conclusion was based on logical reasoning. Since your bias excludes considering that possibility, I will spell it out for you below. If there is any "bias" on my part it is from observing similar politics from CBS in the past (i.e. "fake but accurate"), which in itself is a logical basis for my conclusion.

1. Her position at CBS implied that she was intelligent enough to know not to offend her colleagues.
2. She would have not said something that she believed would offend her colleagues.
3. Therefore, she believed her colleagues were like minded people.
4. She was also intelligent enough to know what her colleagues would find offensive.
5. Therefore, her colleagues were like minded people.

I could be wrong about 1, 2, or 4, but I judge those highly likely to be true.

First of all, you're basing your bias as being logical based on something that happened in the news division of CBS 13 years ago. Hayley Geftman-Gold was a lawyer and a Senior Counselor in the business end of CBS, had been there a year and may well not have known how her co-workers would feel about her remarks.

In short, your "logic" is full of holes and is really nothing more than a rationalization of your personal bias.

---