(10-12-2017, 08:59 AM)leopold332002 Wrote:

(10-12-2017, 08:50 AM)Rico Wrote: So you thought he looked good against the Jets? Really?

No he was bad against the Jets but they could have still won the game and my point is he wasn't the reason why they lost the game like some are claiming on here.

---

(10-12-2017, 08:55 AM)Frailbones Wrote: He's playing in a division with 3 of the best teams in football. 6 games a year.

Jags plays against poo poo.

Okay that's partly true but that division wasn't so good to prevent him from winning more than 2 games in 2015, 5 games in 2016, and 1-4 this team and that's only because the team on the other side was 0-4 as well so i guess somebody had to win right? My point is Phillip Rivers is overrated and not this superstar qb as some are claiming on here.

I'm going to breakdown what you said leopold. Bortles was bad in the jets game, but he wasn't the reason we lost. .....hmmmm. So the dude who touches the ball every snap, who plays the most important position in all of sports, plays bad and you don't be wanna think that contributes in a major way to a loss. It's  weird you wanna give him credit for "almost winning" a game against a bad team (record doesn't matter, the jets  don't have talent) but you don't want to give him credit for poor play and handicapping this team

---