(11-10-2017, 05:13 PM)jagibelieve Wrote:

(11-10-2017, 04:56 PM)Kane Wrote: Hey hey admin... snowflake comments go in political section!
I don't care where or how the Ws come personally....

Are you going to get extra cookies for having a team face of against the best of the best of the best?

You think Manning is sad he didn't face a fearful team in his first SB win instead getting to face off VS Rex frickin Grossman?

You should try to play nice Mr. Admin.

Hey hey user... since when is the term "snowflake" political?

This thread is about Richard Sherman.  I would much rather face a Seattle team with him starting than face a Seattle team with a backup.

Think about it this way.  Is an accomplishment (a victory) really an accomplishment if it's "easy"?  I would have liked to face Houston again with a healthy Watson just like I would like to face Tennessee with a healthy Mariota, just like I would like to face <insert team> with a healthy <insert player>.

To be the best you have to beat the best.

Yes. You beat your sister in an arm wrestling match? A win is a win.

A SB ring is a SB ring... doesn't matter who you faced to get there. Injuries pile up all the time in the NFL.
No matter the opponents or the state of their roster (ours is far from perfect/healthy halfway through the season) the wins count and a Superbowl victory would feel just as sweet if it came against the best the NFL had to offer or otherwise.

Snowflake is the right's term for the left... it's always been political in nature when used in the manner you used it.... but I digress.
To be the best, you have to make it to the SB and win. Period. Clots beat the Grossman led Bears... you think Manning gives a hoot he didn't face off VS the better NFC team that year? Nope. Got him his first ring.

The NFL has 32 teams, and no matter how bad any of them may be, winning in the NFL is never easy.
Think teams will feel bad beating us with AR15 out? With our OL falling apart as the season goes on?

Nahhh

---