(12-30-2017, 04:57 PM)JackCity Wrote:

(12-30-2017, 04:48 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Straight garbage QB

---

Jackson is nowhere close to the prospect Vick was.  Was funny when people made that comparison

---

As fast and good of a runner as Jackson is there isn't 1 thing Jackson does better than Vick did coming out

Awful game for Jackson. 

And yes he is a better prospect. He's more accurate , better in the pocket, better mental process and better at avoiding turnovers (apart from today).   

Mike Vick was an amazing athlete with a big arm. Had almost no nuance of how to play the position.

---

Bad day for me to Stan for Lamar Jackson but here we are.

---

(12-30-2017, 10:28 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: Again, I'll go by what my eyes tell me and nothing else. I see Rudolph hitting Washington, Ateman, Stoner, Abbott, Johnson and Lacey in stride on almost every pass. I don't see consistent adjustment to his passes at all. As for sacks, the Cowboys allowed 25 sacks last season and that ranked 67th out of 130 teams. Much of those sacks came early in the year when Oklahoma State was missing their two best O-Linemen, Center Brad Lunblade and RT Zach Crabtree. 


As for Jackson, I do go by what my eyes tell me. I was simply using what Kiper and McShay said to back up what I had been observing all year. I wasn't agreeing with them, they were stating what I had said for months. We could argue about these two guys for eternity, but instead, I chose to agree to disagree and move on with other prospects.

That's quite odd as even the most ardent Rudolph fans admit he isn't too good from short. 

And yeah probably better off to just see how they play in the NFL. For instance you thought McCaffrey would be bad because he was white. I'd say it's fair to say you were wrong on that.