(02-04-2018, 04:15 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: TJ and Marty, outside of arguing even the most trivial of facts like "water is wet", just for the sake of argument,  do you guys truly feel the content in this memo is false? I am curious.

I've read the memo and I've read enough about the memo to conclude that there should be a lot of doubt about the conclusions as well as the importance of what it is alleging.  

I doubt that any of you Trump supporters are even willing to read anything that might cast doubt on your opinion, but please read this: 

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018...pe=article

The problem is, we haven't seen the actual FISA warrant, and probably never will.  But it should be pointed out that Page was under investigation by the FBI since 2013.  This didn't start in October 2016 as the Republican memo alleges.  Also, the FISA warrant was obtained just a couple of weeks prior to the election, so it would have been impossible to gather any evidence that would have influenced the election at that time. 

The funny thing is, Nunes has stated that he hasn't ever read the FISA warrants he wrote about in his memo.  

It's also worth noting that several important Republicans, including Trey Gowdy, have said the Nunes memo has nothing to do with Mueller's investigation.  Trey Gowdy was one of the authors of the Nunes memo.

I would also like to read the Democratic response, so I think in fairness, their memo should also be released.

---