(02-19-2018, 03:10 PM)rollerjag Wrote:

(02-19-2018, 02:50 PM)Jagsfan4life9/28/82 Wrote: Your post contradicts itself. If his willingness decides life or death, it most certainly will be relevant. I know you meant to say Mama Government would get his guns regardless, but I'm sure he understands that, considering his use of the word willingly.

A gun can be unwillingly surrendered without sacrificing one's life. If you have a car repossessed and they just come and get it, you didn't surrender it willingly.

And yes, if it ever comes down to the Apocalypse the NRA has programmed y'all to expect, Mama Government isn't coming armed with something your AR-15 is going to stop. You can give it up to save your skin, or get buried with it in the rubble. If you save your skin, would you say you did it willingly?

I could be wrong, but his post read as a last stand. And play with words all you want, but if one chooses life over death in that situation, they were willing to surrender theirs arms in trade for their life. Begrudgingly is perhaps the better word.

And I'm not sure what group you're mistakenly trying to lump me into. The last time I listened to anything the NRA said about anything was never. As I said in this thread, or maybe the other one, I'm not much of a gun guy. I'm more of a the government can go [BLEEP] itself kind of guy.

---