Login

MalabarJag · 03-10-2018, 11:36 AM

(03-10-2018, 10:16 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:
(03-10-2018, 09:55 AM)B2hibry Wrote: Boy that’s rich coming from you. Bring up one post I have flopped, blindly sided, etc. Acting like you have half a clue of who I am. Yes, I voted for Trump and his ideas. I didn’t vote for his [BLEEP] personality though. So far, he has made some progress regardless of the numerous roadblocks. Not perfect, but a far cry from the stagnation of the past. It’s about moving this country forward and your kind would be happy going backwards just to spite the current POTUS.

Well, for the record, I would not "be happy going backwards just to spite the current POTUS." For all of our sakes, I hope he's a success.

But I do strongly disagree with many of his policies. For example, I don't see how putting tariffs on steel to protect the steel industry is "moving the country forward." That's moving the country back to the 1920s.   I just don't see how anyone with any sense of logic can favor a thing like that. It protects 50,000 steel jobs and endangers about 6 million jobs in companies that use steel in their products.

I don't see how anyone with half a brain can listen to Trump and not see him for what he is- an ignorant con artist. He doesn't have any idea what he's talking about. All he does is pump himself up as the world's greatest everything, while in reality, he's way out of his depth. No way he should be President of the United States.   When he got on that debate stage with a dozen other Republicans, every other person on that stage would have been a far better President than he is. The man is a complete idiot, and the way some of you cannot see this is mind boggling.

(03-10-2018, 10:05 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Umm, you managed to insult Trump about 10 times in the post you claim is praising the meeting!!!

So? Meeting's a good idea, Trump's an idiot.   Those two things are not mutually exclusive.

(03-10-2018, 10:13 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: He wants a meeting with him, but doesn't want Trump there.

Yes. It would be better with [insert name of any other Republican you want] there instead of Trump.

Kasich would probably just give Kim nukes and then claim he stopped Kim from developing them.

Chris Christie would agree to give Kim billions of dollars in Global Warming reparations.

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"