(03-20-2018, 11:40 PM)Kcirred Wrote:

(03-20-2018, 05:16 PM)Achilles Wrote: It's crazy how much people undervalue Lee. I guess that's the internet age though. Weak minds see an opinion from some figure head and then they all parrot it enough until somehow that becomes the label, even though it's inaccurate. 

Lee has had a few bad drops but the whole drop rate is overblown. 

Anyone who truly thinks hurns brings more to the table than Lee needs to just stop talking about football.

---

Hurns was more of a playmaker than Lee,  Marquis ain't making that diving catch in London.  Unfortunately injuries have made Hurns a shell of his former self, he isn't nearly has fast or agile as he used to be.  Lee isn't undervalued, he just isn't that good, guy is the definition of mediocre.  He can only do crossing routes, led the nfl in drops, and is irrelevant when a corner that isn't terrible is covering him.

Everything you just said either reeks of bias, or again, you don't know what you're talking about. Lee is easily more of a playmaker than hurns. He has more playmaking ability, more speed, more yac ability, he's quicker, jumps higher, etc.

Hurns is a passionate football player, clutch, great on third downs but he doesn't have close to Lee's athletic ability.

---

(03-21-2018, 06:35 AM)MojoKing Wrote: The front office will regret not retaining Hurns or Robinson.

Not even a little bit.

---