(03-21-2018, 10:57 AM)Kcirred Wrote:

(03-21-2018, 08:11 AM)Achilles Wrote: Everything you just said either reeks of bias, or again, you don't know what you're talking about. Lee is easily more of a playmaker than hurns. He has more playmaking ability, more speed, more yac ability, he's quicker, jumps higher, etc.

Hurns is a passionate football player, clutch, great on third downs but he doesn't have close to Lee's athletic ability.

---

LMAO yes my post reeks of bias, you mean facts? I'm far from biased compared to others here.  Does Marquis Lee seriously have fans? Explain how Lee has more playmaking ability, there is no truth to it.  Lee has 8 career touchdowns, Hurns has 21.  Hurns has a 1000 yards season, Lee has zero.  Hurns has multiple touchdowns and catches that are 50+ yards, you'd have to dig deep into the internet to find a Marquis Lee catch 50 yards or longer.  I was being generous calling Lee mediocre, he's a bad receiver being force fed the ball on crossing routes.  He can't make plays on any other routes.  I don't even care that Allen Hurns was cut but the only thing that stopped him were injuries, Lee being a naturally better playmaker than him is laughable.

Lee doesn't have better yac ability either, Lee being faster means nothing and he isn't even all that faster.  He ran a 4.52, Hurns ran a 4.55.  There are zero plays of Lee running away from anybody.  You can find one of Hurns in 10 seconds.  



Lee would of ran out of bounds like he always does.