(03-20-2018, 11:14 AM)Bullseye Wrote:

(03-20-2018, 11:06 AM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: Debatable but I think the potential for Moncrief to be better than Hurns is there.  Even if one were to concede that Hurns is better than Moncrief, that still puts him at 4th on the depth chart behind guys that were much more productive than him last season.  And the point remains that if your 4th receiver has a strong market, your top 3 must be pretty good.  At this point, you’re arguing from a very weak point.  You can believe Hurns would have been 1 or 2 this year but you’d have a very difficult time backing that up with anything substantive.

Let me preface by stating that I was high on Moncrief in 2014.

Furthermore, I understand there are different circumstances in each organization that can impact player productivity, in a good or bad way.

But if Moncrief could not succeed in Indy with Luck throwing him the ball, why would he succeed more than Hurns here?

As far as being "much less productive"...https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/jax/2017.htm

Not sure if he was "much less productive." 

Now could you argue his productivity was not worth $7 million/year?  Sure.