(03-30-2018, 04:13 PM)Kane Wrote:

(03-30-2018, 04:05 PM)I am Yoda Wrote: I wonder if there is such as thing a true BAP, since there is no purely objective way to grade players?

Sure there is.
You make a board...
1. player a
2. player b
3. player c
etc
and you pick the player on the top of your board regardless of position.

Your BAP may not match someone else's. But pure BAP picking would be making your board and selecting the guy at the very top, every time.
To many people's point, I doubt many if any GMs do this... as player a and b may be very close in value and so you would select the player that fits a higher need.

Yes.  That's why I asked the question.  A gm/scout can assign a value to a player, but someone else will rank him just a little differently (or maybe quite differently).  It's got art to it as well as science.  I don't think anyone should stress over choosing a player at a position of need as long as consensus doesn't rank some other player wildly higher.  I guess I'm saying there are reaches and then there are REACHES. (Not being argumentative.)

For example do we really need to draft another DL just because we have him ranked ahead of a LB that we'd like to have and LB is a thinner position depth-wise?

---