The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Annual Site Wide Mock GM LOUNGE DISCUSSION
|
(04-01-2018, 03:37 PM)JNev Wrote:I agree some what I just think we will be in much better shape if we don’t take a WR in the 1st round. We will find great value in the 2nd if we want to go that route.(04-01-2018, 02:35 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Good God I hope the draft dont fall like this. To me Michael Gallup is the best player on the board but we took Ridley. This is why there is no way I would take a WR in the first. Gallup is just as good a prospect as Ridley imo and he probably falls to the 2nd (04-01-2018, 03:48 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:(04-01-2018, 03:37 PM)JNev Wrote: I think theres a lot of hive mind with this draft. People on here are more likely to take guys we've been discussing so I doubt the draft falls similarly to what we predict It’s an offensive heavy draft in the early rounds |
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.