Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
A Good Read from Ryan O'Halloran

#7
(This post was last modified: 04-05-2018, 10:12 AM by Bullseye.)

(04-05-2018, 10:03 AM)pirkster Wrote: I get that QB runs force your hand.

But maybe this time we let it play out if we aren't convinced there's a "must have" guy for us in this draft that we can realistically get.

What if NE uses their firepower to get one of their own.

Would they be parting ways with Hoyer?  If not Hoyer, I'm sure other veterans will be hitting the market closer to cuts if they aren't comfortable with Kessler by then.

It's better to have options, than to force yourself into a decision.

Maybe we just sit still and let it unfold.  It could be we come away from this draft with only a backup and not a potential starter.  It's not like we're going to have a chance at the top of the crop.  We're going to be looking at second tier guys anyway.  Not unless there's a monster move.  I'm not sure that's necessary.  I don't think we're in a position to feel compelled to do that, and I don't see the QB worth doing that for in this class.

The really difficult thing for me in trading up for a QB is that this team was close enough to the Super Bowl to wholly justify the "immediate impact" sort of guy to try to get them over the top.

In my mind, QB is not an immediate impact player.  As much promise as Carson Wentz showed in his first year, he took a huge leap in his second year, as did Goff.

Mahomes may or may not thrive under Reid, but Reid kept him on the bench his first year.

With a high QB pick, whether by trading up or standing pat, the reward of stabilizing the position and theoretically extending the contention window is enticing.  But the risk of possibly shortening the window by eschewing the immediate impact player for a guy who may not even develop into the guy at QB is high.

(04-05-2018, 10:00 AM)Dimson Wrote: I am all for trading up as long as we get the right guys. Just don't pull a Gene Smith when you trade up.

That's the thing about drafting.

Whether you trade up or not, whether you use BAP/Need or some combination, you gotta get the right guys.

If you evaluate properly, it shouldn't be an issue.
 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply


Messages In This Thread
A Good Read from Ryan O'Halloran - by Bullseye - 04-05-2018, 09:23 AM
RE: A Good Read from Ryan O'Halloran - by Upper - 04-05-2018, 09:33 AM
RE: A Good Read from Ryan O'Halloran - by Dimson - 04-05-2018, 10:00 AM
RE: A Good Read from Ryan O'Halloran - by Bullseye - 04-05-2018, 10:11 AM
RE: A Good Read from Ryan O'Halloran - by knarnn - 04-05-2018, 04:25 PM
RE: A Good Read from Ryan O'Halloran - by PF* - 04-05-2018, 03:50 PM
RE: A Good Read from Ryan O'Halloran - by PF* - 04-05-2018, 04:07 PM
RE: A Good Read from Ryan O'Halloran - by Jags02 - 04-05-2018, 04:35 PM
RE: A Good Read from Ryan O'Halloran - by Upper - 04-05-2018, 06:02 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!