(04-11-2018, 01:40 PM)Jags02 Wrote:

(04-11-2018, 01:34 PM)Markulous Wrote: The issue here is the talent pool of the draft.  At #29, O-line talent>WR/TE talent.  If talent wasn't an issue and we could have a stud WR1 or stud TE, then yeah absolutely I would rather have that than a RG, but that's not the case.

You're banking on Wynn, C. Williams or Hernandez being there at #29 to say the talent is superior to the top TEs. Meanwhile, it's starting to look more and more like Courtland Sutton might actually be there, and I'd take him flat out over any other prospect who might be there including the OLs and TEs. That said, I can see a few ideal OLs sitting there at the end of round two, so if Sutton is not there at #29, I'm taking a TE. I'd order them Goedert, Gesicki, Hurst, but I'd be happy with any of them.

Jags02, I'm with you on this.  The Jags need someone with size at receiver whether it be a WR or a TE.  Both Sutton and Goedert can out muscle and win the 50/50 balls.  From what I've seen they are also willing blockers.  I know Gesicki's combine was off the charts, but when I see film of him he seems really awkward.  Hurst would be interesting since he was used a lot in the backfield.  But, I wouldn't take either of those two in the first.  Ian Thomas, Mark Andrews intrigue me in the 2nd. Troy Fumagalli and Dalton Schultz in the 3rd are also a possibility.  After picking up Norwell in FA, I think taking OL in the first or 2nd is a bit of overkill this year.  Though I do subscribe to the theory that you win in the trenches.

---