(04-18-2018, 10:51 PM)knarnn Wrote:

(04-18-2018, 10:37 PM)Bullseye Wrote: We don't have the ammo to get him if he did fall that far.

It would probably cost a 1/2/3 this year and handful of high future picks but it could be done.

This is what I'm talking about.

I don't think this team would give up that many picks to trade up.  Even if the team were willing to give up that much for Rosen, there are other QB hungry teams with higher picks that would probably entice a team. 

Actually, I think if Rosen falls that far, the action would be at pick 10, as teams would look to deal above Miami and/or Buffalo.

Edit:

Last year, Houston gave up a first last year and a first this year to move up 13 spots to get Watson.

Last year, the Chiefs gave up a first last year, a 3rd last year and a first this year to move up 17 spots to get Mahomes.  We would be moving up 19 spots to get Rosen-assuming we'd have to get to 10.

The only other trades I can remember that involved a team picking in the late 20s+ to move up to the top ten was back in 1995, when the 49ers traded a first (30th overall), a 3rd and a 4th round pick that year, and a first round pick in 1996 to get J.J. Stokes., and Atlanta traded a 1st, 2nd and 4th round pick in 2011 and 2012 1st and 4th round picks to Cleveland to move from 27 to 6th overall to draft Julio Jones.


Thinking about it, it's doable theoretically. I guess my perception is that Rosen is viewed more favorably than Mahomes was last year, plus with Miami, Buffalo, Arizona, and now New England with needs at QB and either in closer proximity position wise to San Fran, or with more draft capital this year (Buffalo, New England), it would be difficult to outbid those teams.

---