The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Daniel Jeremiah Mock 3.0
|
(04-17-2018, 10:14 PM)knarnn Wrote:(04-17-2018, 07:46 PM)Bullseye Wrote: https://www.bigcatcountry.com/2018/4/17/...le-jaguars I missed that. (04-18-2018, 01:39 AM)Upper Wrote:(04-17-2018, 10:49 AM)Bullseye Wrote: We have to find a way to get that 8th guy out of the box. So anything other than a 3-4 WR set will guarantee an 8th guy in the box? That's not good at all. If we lined up in 21 (2 RBs 1 TE), we need to be good enough at WR to keep that 8th guy out of the box. If we lined up in 12 (1 RB-2TE), even though that is a predominantly run look, we still need to be good enough at WR to keep that 8th guy out of the box, some of the time. Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.