(04-27-2018, 03:59 PM)FreeAgent01 Wrote:

(04-27-2018, 02:11 PM)atburg Wrote: La. Times had him at 22 6 weeks ago, anything else?

(04-27-2018, 03:43 PM)pirkster Wrote: Mayock 26.

Truth is, most had him off the board before our pick at 29.

I know this doesn't fit some folks' narrative, but facts don't care about your feelings.

LA times was 3.5 weeks ago and Mayock was the day before yesterday.  Both are well after the NFL Combine.  

Casserly was legit, but the point still remains that he wasn't generally considered a top prospect until after the Combine.  How many mocks did you have to sift through before finding one?  I found plenty that didn't have him in the top three rounds.

Here is another pre combine mock by SI that has him going at 26. https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/02/21/mock-d...len-giants

People have shown evidence that he was considered a top prospect in pre combine mocks that you are either choosing to down play or ignore. What hasn't been shown is any evidence that he was considered a late round prospect as you have contended.

If you want to make a valid argument, you need to show something that backs up your contention.

---