(09-17-2018, 11:28 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:

(09-17-2018, 11:19 AM)rollerjag Wrote: Looks like we may get to see how many male Republican senators have it in them to attack her credibility to her face, then go home to face their wives, daughters and female constituents.

As for a stalling tactic, I've got two words for you: Merrick Garland. You reap what you sow.

She can testify under oath this week. Kavanaugh is ready to do so immediately.

Are you saying a female accusing someone of sexual assault shouldn't have to testify because of the nature of the situation? Why would republican senators feel bad about facing the women in their lives after questioning a far left liberal over a sexual assault accusation decades later that came out before a confirmation vote?

She will testify willingly, and I agree the Senators have the right to question her. We'll see how tough they get. 

We're not talking about some porn star or Playboy model here. She's a well educated, successful woman who revealed this incident in a therapy session 6 years ago. Is she a bad person for suppressing a traumatic event for decades until she realized her assailant was about to be placed on the Supreme Court? If a man who your wife/secretary/co-worker accused of assaulting her in high school came to you looking for a job 40 years later, would you hire him, or instead question his accuser's credibility?

---