(12-23-2018, 07:30 PM)Bullseye Wrote:

(12-23-2018, 07:24 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Unless they have some sort of bead on a guy that projects later. Seems risky in this crop, though. 
(I don't think Grier falls to the second like many do)

I'm no draft guru by any stretch - but the little bit of armchair analysis I've done makes it seem there are 4 top prospects - two of them look like they may be potential starters at some point in their rookie years. Again - that's a very amateur analysis of what I see from this QB class right now.  (it's still early) 

If the Jags don't spend big on a FA QB (and I don't think they will) then getting a rookie that can get on the field sooner than later will be very valuable given their other prospects at the position. 

That - to me - means taking one early.

I get that...but for those who argue draft position doesn't matter...if what you (plural) say is true, it shouldn't matter when in the draft the Jaguars take a QB.

But you are saying we definitely should take one early, and you don't believe Grier will be there in round 2.

Of course draft position matters. Especially when you're (ostensibly) targeting a position that is overdrafted by a few teams each year. 

I just really hate the concept of intentionally losing games, and I can't bear to root for my team to lose. So on a day like today I root for my team to win, but I don't get upset if they lose.

---