(12-24-2018, 09:32 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(12-24-2018, 08:21 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: What is your point? Just be blunt and get to the point. To me, it comes down to whichever team wants him more and is willing to give up the most to move up. Period.

Last year the Jets gave up THREE 2nd round picks to move up on 3 spots from #6 to #3 overall. 
(That included giving up their #6 as well of course)
Sounds like what you are suggesting will cost a lot more than that if I'm reading you right. 

That's a hard sacrifice to justify if we end up sitting at #6 or #7 after losing to the tinhorns next week.

When it comes to getting a franchise QB, I believe it is easily justified. We haven't had a franchise QB since Mark Brunell. If it weren't for the position of QB being so important, I'd never advocate trading up. Most years I'm begging to trade down. Quarterbacks are just so important to winning franchises though, that when you spot one you want, you do anything you can to get him.

---

(12-24-2018, 09:33 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(12-24-2018, 08:21 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: What is your point? Just be blunt and get to the point. To me, it comes down to whichever team wants him more and is willing to give up the most to move up. Period.

I dont think either will trade up for him and I think he will be there when we pick.  But will we pick him or one of the other QBs?  That is the question.  I just hope our new GM dont get fleeced like you would

I don't care about the cost at all. I just want a true franchise QB. I don't care who it is, as long as they are successful. IMO, Haskins just has the highest percentage of being successful in the NFL. If we don't get him though, I'll be cheering for which ever QB we pick. I'm just sick of not having a good QB, and I'd pay any amount to get one.

---