(02-04-2019, 11:28 AM)JackCity Wrote:

(02-04-2019, 10:44 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: He would be the 2nd best QB in the division behind Luck

---

He isnt the only QB that could make us the 2nd best team in the league, but he is 1 of them. We were a top 4 team with Bortles so it's not a stretch to improve to a top 2 team.  We just have to stay some what healthy and have good QB play

Who are the other ones available to us this year?

There arent any more FA QBs available this year that could make us as good as we were a couple years ago imo.  I like a few in the draft it's just more of a risk.

---

(02-04-2019, 11:40 AM)JackCity Wrote:

(02-04-2019, 10:50 AM)Bullseye Wrote: It is an odd stance, but I have been wrestling with the logic behind a Foles acquisition for a few weeks and the same questions I posed to you popped in my head.

In short, I am not trying to assail your logic or his.  Just trying to be convinced either way on Foles.

The fact there is so much discomfort  over him should say something, I am beginning to think.

He'd be the 3rd best QB in the division.  

I think most people agree he'd make us better. Personally feel thinking he can give us average level production is fair , maybe he can lead a game winning drive or two and win a game a late, something Blake rarely did. 

I'm not going to be the team who gives him 25 million a year for that and I'm certaintly not going to expected him to make us the 2nd best team in football + be a top 10 QB

If it was trade our late 3rd round pick for Foles or trade future 1sts to move up and get Haskins.  I'd rather trade our late 3rd round pick than give up furlture 1sts to move up.  I'd even rather trade back to get more picks than move up like some want to do

---