(01-14-2019, 04:38 PM)B2hibry Wrote: I don't know. I think I'd be willing to try and trade for Brisset before bringing Flacco.

No way. Brisset showed me nothing.

---

(02-13-2019, 12:56 PM)Rico Wrote:

(02-13-2019, 12:30 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Nice looking more and more like Foles will be the guy

I don't see how one thing has anything to do with the other.

Agreed. This could mean we are working on a trade up to get Haskins. It could also mean we are settled on Lock. Maybe we are looking for Tannenhill to be released. In the end, the Flacco trade has nothing to do with our situation.

---

(02-13-2019, 01:13 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Flacco to the broncs is good news in that the Jags aren't trading for him I guess.  (He's barely an upgrade if at all)

But the broncs can (probably will) still draft a QB. They only gave up a fourth and Flacco's salary is high (18mil) in 2019  -  but there's an out clause after that. I'm assuming the out clause will still be available to the new club to exercise after 2019.

They may just see Flacco as a one year, $18 million dollar bridge.

I don't think so. If anything, I think this signals that they are gonna wait until 2020 to draft a QB.

---