Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
New Attorney General Barr Ending Mueller Investigation ‘By Next Week’

#37

(02-22-2019, 08:16 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(02-22-2019, 02:15 AM)jj82284 Wrote: As to Benghazi vs. Beirut a.) Is there anyone who seriously thinks at any time in history it would have been politically advantageous for the Dems to try and portray Reagan as soft on Defense?  b.) There was this little thing called 9-11 which sharpened our national focus on individual terror attacks instead of more generalized defense postures against nation states. c.) Schultz wasn't a presumptive nominee for president. d.) The Reagan administration didn't bold faced lie to the American people and blame an American citizen and a video no one saw.  

a) listen to yourself. Mistakes happen, and must be learned from, but trying to leverage dead American soldiers for political advantage is disgusting. Democrats in 1983 recognized this. Republicans in 2012 should have done better.

B) I'm not sure I get the relevance. Neither the unofficial consulate nor the CIA annex were well-know, high value targets. Not like an embassy or barracks.

C) again listen to yourself. You're saying the Democrats didn't go after Schultz because Schultz wasn't very valuable to the Republican party plans. And that the Republicans went after Clinton because she was valuable to Democrats. again you're taking it as a given that Congressional investigators would put party first over dead American soldiers, and you don't seem to be conscious of how disgusting it is to the memory of those soldiers and how corrosive it will be for our republic in general. You also don't seem conscious of the fact that this supports my original point, let the investigations into Trump going forward will follow the pattern of the investigations of Benghazi. Trump is also a high-value target like Clinton was. If you're going to justify endless and pointless partisan investigations based on the value of the target, then turnabout is definitely fair play.

D) that's a fair point. we never did get to the bottom of why Susan Rice said the provable falsehoods that she said. of all the things that transpired from the moment after bad guys open fire on us in Benghazi, this is the one undeniable mistake that the administration at the time made. but within 24 hours all of the other Democrats and all of the media were unified and saying that there was no truth to what Susan Rice had said. this is where the Benghazi thing gets really similar to what Trump has done and what his administration is about to experience from the House. Trump and his people go on TV and utter provable falsehoods all the time.

Next time just lead with the fact I was right, they were different and save yourself the typing.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: New Attorney General Barr Ending Mueller Investigation ‘By Next Week’ - by jj82284 - 02-22-2019, 09:26 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!