(03-05-2019, 01:01 PM)copycat Wrote:

(03-05-2019, 12:35 PM)JagsFansince1995 Wrote: I like his takes.  He seems to know what we all have known for sometime now about needing OL depth and the other position groups needing improvement.  I'm done with the Bortles talkm, but i'm a little confused on the foles take.  We have known that this offense lacked talent and a competent gameplan to succeed unless the run game was lights out.  Bringing in a 30 yr old backup QB to take over and saying we still need to fix the issues that have been holding the team back  on O, is a big risk.  It's not like we have been moving right along with the offensive players we have so what are people expecting.  The article says Great teams are Great teams and a QB is not going to carry the offense, especially with no superstars.  

Same Scenario, Older Quarterback.   So what am i missing that Foles is suppose to be bringing to the table instead of drafting a new QB or fixing those same holes we already know about.

This is what I came away with as well.  If we need to fix all the things that hindered Bortles for Foles to be successful then what is the point of picking up Nick?

It was also nice to see a national writer point out the passion of this fan base.