Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
No love for Fant around here?

#10
(This post was last modified: 03-06-2019, 12:04 PM by BlueEyedJag.)

(03-06-2019, 11:24 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: The only way they will be able to trade down is if Murray or Haskins is available at 7. If not, no one is going to trade up.

If they stay at 7 (and assuming they sign Foles), I want Taylor from Florida or Hockenson. If they can come away from this draft with:

1. Hockenson or Taylor
2. Hakeem Butler or Paris Campbell
3. BA running back.
3. BA TE

I think you are looking at a totally revamped offense. I would prefer them to sign a RG or RT in FA.

Agree with Taylor/Hockenson being the pick...I would even add Ford as a possibility.

As far as trade downs.  I see a lot of potential scenarios.

1.) Oakland grabs Murray/Haskins at #4 but wants a premier WR prospect in Metcalf to pair with him.  They have 2 additional late round 1st after #4.
2.) One of Miami/Washington/Denver come up to grab the next QB...Washington is going to have to look at the draft for a QB.
3.) GB has an additional late round 1st to pair with #12.  They could get their pick of edge rusher...Sweat/Allen/Ferrell/Gary.
4.) Devin White is seen as the Premier MLB, then guys like Oliver/Gary who are athletic freaks could draw some attention.

As for FA...If we sign Foles that is probably it as far as potential "starters". Maybe a backup TE2 could be signed but Hyde/Jackson/Bortles cap savings are going to be used on Foles/Draft picks. They could cut Parnell/Gipson but you better draft Taylor if you cut Parnell.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: No love for Fant around here? - by pirkster - 03-06-2019, 12:29 AM
RE: No love for Fant around here? - by Mikey - 03-06-2019, 10:02 AM
RE: No love for Fant around here? - by JagJohn - 03-06-2019, 10:25 AM
RE: No love for Fant around here? - by PF* - 03-06-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: No love for Fant around here? - by Cleatwood - 03-06-2019, 11:24 AM
RE: No love for Fant around here? - by JagJohn - 03-06-2019, 11:32 AM
RE: No love for Fant around here? - by BlueEyedJag - 03-06-2019, 12:01 PM
RE: No love for Fant around here? - by Cleatwood - 03-06-2019, 12:07 PM
RE: No love for Fant around here? - by Bullseye - 03-06-2019, 01:32 PM
RE: No love for Fant around here? - by Cleatwood - 03-06-2019, 02:10 PM
RE: No love for Fant around here? - by Bullseye - 03-06-2019, 10:05 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!