(03-14-2019, 07:31 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: If we take a TE in the first it wont even be a debate.  I do hope we take another one in the mid to later rounds.  I like Caleb Wilson as a recieving TE if we want to go that route

If we take Hockenson at 7, I'd love a late 3rd or 4th round selection of Wilson.

---

(03-14-2019, 11:15 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(03-14-2019, 11:07 PM)Bullseye Wrote: Hypothetical:  Suppose we take Hockenson at 7, and by some chance, Fant is there for us at our pick in the 2nd round.

Do you take him?

That's the conundrum I faced with a recent Fanspeak mock.

I wound up taking him, then Kaleb Mcgary in the 3rd.

(God bless Fanspeak!  LOL)

I like the idea of taking two TEs - but I’d not use that much early capital with the question marks at RT.

Understood.  It was a calculated risk.  Because I knew where McGary was on the board, I went Fant in the 2nd.

I've been running fanspeak mocks pretty much all night.  The way it's typically turned out, one of three things would happen.  If I took the T early, I wound up not getting the TE until much later.  If I took the TE, just the opposite would happen.  There was one scenario where Bosa was there at 7, and another scenario where Q Williams was there.

---