(03-14-2019, 12:17 PM)Upper Wrote:

(03-14-2019, 11:56 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: I have OL and TE prioritized WELL ahead of WR.
I think OL and TE ideally will consume 2 of the first three picks for the Jags.

I’d love to see a tackle with versatility to play inside selected.

I'm not sure about the OL need priority anymore. We basically have 4/5 of the OL locked in after Cann re-signed, and we drafted a pretty strong candidate to fill that 5th spot last year.

One the WR side, I think we only have one decent startable WR. Chark will hopefully show some development, but I have no faith in anyone after Dede and blind hope in Chark.

And y'all know my reservations for Cam Robinson, while knowing Cann sucks, so I'm definitely not saying oline is strong...just that WR is extraordinarily weak.

I still think OL is a huge priority.

Aside from the fact we have no RT, the entire left side of our OL are coming back from serious injuries.

Furthermore, as many have observed, Cann could be upgraded.

So from an immediate starter perspective, from a competition/upgrade standpoint, and from a depth standpoint, we need OLs.

---

(03-14-2019, 09:30 AM)Dimson Wrote:

(03-14-2019, 08:46 AM)Bullseye Wrote: I agree.

In fact double dipping on the o line in addition to TE would be my ideal scenario.  Assuming we keep all seven picks, we could still pick a WR, RB, and a defender.

My ideal positions to be selected would be a traditional TE, a pass catching TE, a guard who can play Center or Tackle as well, a Right Tackle, a shifty RB who can catch a ball, a possession WR and then the best defensive player remaining with the last pick or a developmental QB to compete for the back up role.

I can't argue too much with this.

---

(03-14-2019, 10:32 AM)jaglou53 Wrote:

(03-14-2019, 09:35 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: I like the idea of Hockenson in round 1 and then finding another one in round 3 or 4. Last year, Ian Thomas, Mark Andrews, Chris Herndon and Jordan Akins all went in round 3 or later.

Yea, I think Moreau will be there at the top of round 4. He and Hockenson would be a great combo. If he's not Nauta would also be a good pick.

I want to see how Nauta does at his pro day.

His combine 40 was scary bad and awfully disappointing.

---

(03-14-2019, 02:37 PM)roycee Wrote: I could see them bringing in Tyler Eifert on a one year "prove it" deal. I don't think it would effect draft strategy too much and they'd look to pick one up early in the draft.

TC mentioned the team isn't done in FA and is looking for a bargain.

If he can be brought in at a bargain price, Eifert may be worth the risk, and if paired with a rookie TE like Hockenson, maybe some of the wear and tear can be taken from him and he can be more durable.

---