(04-22-2019, 09:01 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(04-22-2019, 08:51 PM)JackCity Wrote: Would you draft the next Trent Richardson over the next Fletcher Cox? Try think of your debate points  before you type them

---

It's not just BAP though. Positional value and need is built into every draft pick. 

Cmon, you've been through enough drafts to know that by now

Why did you answer my question with a question? Cmon man, the position is more valuable though so why not take Beasley or Fowler over them? No but I would take Saquan Barkley over Cox.  Thats fine if you dont like Hockenson at 7 because hes a TE but most of the fan base will like the pick

Because it was an illogical question. Have you ever considered why the NFL views RB as the most replaceable position on offense or defense? 

Positional value not mattering is how you end up with a punter in the 3rd or a kicker in the 2nd like the Bucs. Those GMs ignored the value of the position and ended up with two of the worst picks in NFL history.

And no i think Hockenson is going to be a very good player and I'd be happy to have him. Just would have other players ahead of him as they are also going to be very good and play much more valuable spots (QB included but isn't going to happen). It's not like Fournette where we took a RB at #4 in the deepest class of all time when we desperately needed a QB and realistically could have taken one

---