(09-27-2019, 09:46 PM)B2hibry Wrote:

(09-27-2019, 09:12 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Holy [BLEEP]! That might be the most direct evidence of trolling or serious mental deficiency portrayed on this board ever.  Everything you said is wrong and I cannot imagine how you can breathe after such intellectual contortions.

If it weren't so sad, I'd be laughing. It hurts to think there are more people like this out there that are blinded by the grandeur (lol) of that Big-D! Facts be damned. It's nuts.

---

Interesting Sesame Street-like break-down of events.

https://www.facebook.com/GlennBeck/video...682029969/

It's a good video.
I see clear and credible allegations of nepotism, and exchanging closeness to US government decision makers for seats on boards.  But this could just as easily be the story of Chelsea Clinton, Dick Cheney, or George W Bush or Jeb Bush. 
As a country, we decided a long time ago that we were okay with nepotism, and we decided even longer before that that we were okay with people profiting off of executing our policy. Now I don't like either decision, and I'm fine to go back on both now, but let's at least apply it evenly.
Trump has also gotten in on nepotism while executing foreign policy. His son-in-law and his two sons have profited off of Trump's visits to the middle East at a minimum, and there are probably other relationships that we don't know about yet.
But what Bush, Clinton and Biden never did was try to divert foreign policy into damaging the other political party. Skim a little profit, no one's gotten in trouble for 30+ years. No one seems to care if Chelsea gets to collect a 10% finder's fee as long as the other 90% went to the US foreign policy objective. But letting a sitting president use his foreign policy powers to hurt the other party is unprecedented.  You will not find another example.

---