Yeah, compared to the horrors of some of the QBs Jacksonville has already, i'd take Gardner over all of those guys (Brunell an obvious exception). Gabbert, Bortles, Leftwich, even Garrard has some really bad stretches of play. [BLEEP] henne. I feel like there's another i'm not remembering at the moment...

Gardner's gonna be fine. And if he isn't? Then aren't you glad to have him as a backup compared to so many other dudes who don't win multiple ROTW awards? It's not like he didn't earn those every week he won one. Schedule be damned.

Brady's had some bad games this year, and a few of them against teams i'm sure Pats fans would deem significantly inferior to them. I doubt they're ready to retire Brady yet.

If Minshew starts making really bad decisions in the next several games that affects ball security - copious amounts of fumbles and interceptions, poor passes way overshot or undershot, etc. - then I'll be thinking he's a backup or bridge guy at best. But save for the Saints game (which, by the way, the absolutely blew the [BLEEP] up out of the Bears today) and today, Gardner's had some real solid moments of excellent quarterbacking. I think because of what he showed in a game against Tennessee, those quick TD strikes, we just accepted that is who he is and that's how it ought to be going forward, but it's never that simple.

And again, Foles would get killed behind this line. We're talking about a guy who hasn't started all 16 games since when again? I'm honestly asking because I forget. Foles has had some really, really [BLEEP] years before he won a superbowl. He's also had some great moments too. It's called DEVELOPMENT.

---