(10-22-2019, 10:09 AM)Upper Wrote:

(10-22-2019, 10:04 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Because there's no credible evidence that Coughlin did anything out of line, meanwhile, the quitter gave us more than enough documented proof of his misdeeds.

He got reprimanded by the league office for publicly calling out players not attending voluntary workouts. And we know enough of the story to say that him chewing out Ramsey in the locker room was beyond the scope of his duties as well. The locker room is Marrone's and Coughlin stepped over the line.

Oh boo hoo. Everything in "Football Operations" belongs to Coughlin. It's in his damn title for pete's sake.

Wait a minute, you said it was in the locker room? I thought it was in a super secret meeting room that only 4 people were in at the time? How can this conflicting information be presented so that it puts your favored party into a better light? By exaggeration, what the quitter was the very best at delivering and some here are great at receiving.

---

(10-22-2019, 11:09 AM)Upper Wrote:

(10-22-2019, 10:29 AM)I am Yoda Wrote: You and some others keep saying that reprimanding a player is beyond the scope of his duties. You’re asserting facts that are not in evidence.  He is the football czar. Other than the owner, he is at the top of the chain of command. He is within his authority to do what he did. You may not like that fact or you may think that it was counterproductive. But he was not wrong. So would you need to understand that occasionally in life it’s not both people were wrong it’s one person was wrong. And Ramsey was that person.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Doing it in the locker room in front of the whole team was the problem. That's Marrone's turf. Coughlin doing what he did was castrating Marrone just as much as it was Ramsey. And we've seen Marrone show exasperation with the situation recently in his presser too.

There you go again.

---