(10-22-2019, 11:16 AM)Upper Wrote:

(10-22-2019, 11:15 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Sounds like hearsay by the quitter's camp.

Vito and Frenette both confirmed it.

---

(10-22-2019, 11:15 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Sounds like hearsay by the quitter's camp. Now we're up to two meetings where Coughlin attacked the poor innocent little cornerback.

I don't have as big of a problem with the behind closed doors meeting. That's the proper avenue to do it. It sounds like it was set up to be an intimidation tactic more than an actual peace offering meeting as it was portrayed to be, but at least the setting was right.

I think the circumstances of the sideline confrontation warranted exactly the response everyone assumes happened; I would've been fine with Coughlin suspending him on the spot and telling him to get his own ride home. The rest of what played out from that moment was poor little quitter's feelings being emoted all over the air for the public to see and if I were Coughlin I would've suspended him for that bull [BLEEP] too.

---

(10-22-2019, 11:23 AM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(10-22-2019, 11:16 AM)Upper Wrote: Vito and Frenette both confirmed it.

---

They tweeted in relative support of the source.  They didn't confirm exactly how or where it happened.  If Ramsey, a FIRST PERSON, participant says otherwise, I think you may need to consider that. 

Regardless, we absolutely can't be certain that Ramsey received a public admonishment from Coughlin at this point.
(Even if he deserved one)
And remember, I'm no Coughlin fan.  I throw a very suspicious eye his way regularly.

Frenette also specifically wrote that this whole situation was because 20 was coddled and the FO should've punished him for the initial incident. Turns out Coughlin went soft on him and that just made it worse.

---