(10-24-2019, 10:29 AM)mikesez Wrote:

(10-24-2019, 10:14 AM)jj82284 Wrote: Here we go again.  

Trump did x.

Completely empirically and verifiably disprove it.  

Well he WANTED TO.  

In determining an extortive act you have to demonstrate that the subject felt pressure, they didnt.  

To demonstrate corrupt intent you have to demonstrate that there is no evidence that the Ukrainian or bidens past behavior could conceivably meet the reasonable suspicion standard for corrupt illicit or illegal activity.  There is evidence.  Moreover, the witnesses who are testifying their interpretations of corrupt intent are demonstrating consistent ignorance of the evidence.  

To establish attempt to extort, all you need are statements or testimony that illuminate the suspects intents and motives.  We're getting that more and more every day.

If the intent was actually to investigate either Biden for violations of US law, DoJ would have handled that.  Rudy of course has a right to play the role of private investigator to investigate his own suspicions, but you can't use the carrots and sticks of government if you're only wearing the hat of a private citizen.

1.) What attempt?  He never mentioned it once.  We have the damn transcript.  All the testimony is renderednfslse because of the transcript.  

2.) Its been two weeks.  What part of I want the ag to call you dont u understand.  I'll say it again I'll keep saying it until u get it, the function of introducing or facilitating cooperation between officers of separate nations is a diplomatic function of the executive, ESPECIALLY with a new administration coming in!  

The alternate reality u people try to imagine to make something seem illicit is like something out of inception.  

Billion dollars for a no show job?  With a proven money trail and admitted extortion?   No one cares Bout that. 

But GASP people were gossiping about what trump might have dreamt of last night.  It must be true!

#TDS
#FANTASIA
#GRASPING@PLASTICSTRAWS
#CANUSPELLEXCULPATE

---