(11-12-2019, 10:31 AM)JackCity Wrote:

(11-12-2019, 03:47 AM)rpr52121 Wrote: Since 2000, 60 players with 9 ints in their first 3 seasons. Since the Merger, there have been 223 such players in their first 3 seasons.
Since 2000, 17 players with 44 passes defended in their first 3 seasons. Since the Merger, there have been 19 such players in their first 3 seasons.
Since 2000, 46 cornerbacks with 176 tackles in first 3 their seasons. Since the Merger, there have been 81 such players in their first 3 seasons.

I hope we aren't using tackles and PDs as a way to judge quality in cornerbacks. Even picks is a pretty poor way

---

(11-12-2019, 02:07 AM)rpr52121 Wrote: The No.1 guy on their list only had 50 more snaps than Ramsey.

Over the last 2 season, Ramsey just seems inconsistent at times, primarily when he feels that he is not matched up against an elite WR. He definitely steps up his play when going against the best, and varying times for big moments. But the the great CB's do that and then roast the non-elite WR/QB with monster games and huge plays consistently. I can honestly only think of a few games that Ramsey took over, and I'm pretty sure the Jags didn't even win the majority of those games.

He allowed a passer rating of 73 last season. I'll take that "inconsistency" over most corners in the league.

I know stats are not the best way. Having said that, elite/generational CB’s still pile up those “poor” metrics. The argument is that just because you have those numbers doesn’t mean you are elite, but if you are, why don’t you have more defining moments?

My entire point is that, sure he is a top 10 CB at the moment, but to be worthy of a $20+ Million/year contract he needs more production.

---