(11-23-2019, 10:53 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(11-23-2019, 10:37 PM)MalabarJag Wrote: This makes absolutely no sense. It's a poor analogy, and in any case there is no "bribery" in your narrative.

maybe it would help you see the analogy if I added that the guy in charge of the building department is a Democratic party activist, while the contracting firm you work for is led by a candidate for office with the Republican Party?

---

(11-23-2019, 08:23 PM)jj82284 Wrote: Lolz.  That made me spit out my coffee.  The ethicacy and legality of the first incident is directly correlated to both the probable cause and national interest of requesting an investigation about said incident.  

#ishouldbecharging4this

Republicans were in charge of both the Senate and the House when VP Biden did what he did.  No investigation.  No comment.  Why not? How is this probable cause that is so obvious to you today not obvious last year? Or the year before, or the year before?

Because Trump, not the Republican Party, is interested in rooting out the corruption that flows through Ukraine. You aren't this dense, you just can't admit that what he's doing is the right thing and necessary for the good of our country. Just remember, the harder they fight to stop him the deeper is their guilt. And this point is quite obvious as you clearly have taken the same position as Schiff, Pelosi, and Romney and willfully refuse to see the truth.

---