(12-22-2019, 12:25 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Anyone who puts "thought leader" into their bio is a giant tool.

Admittedly, I thought the same thing. That is a comment that wouldnt be anywhere near my CV. That said I like Tony Khan, and I think his bio should try so hard. He had an interesting enough position without that pointless insert.

---

(12-22-2019, 08:22 AM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(12-22-2019, 12:12 AM)Upper Wrote: I mean...maybe if the FO had listened to the analytics it might be different.

Agreed. 

If Tony Khan is in the mix for a GM spot or just an increased role in personnel steering, then I think it will be because he can point to specific instances over the years where his analytics were ignored to the team's detriment.

sidenote: I think it's funny that some folks believe Tony Khan has spent this many years analyzing and evaluating NCAA and NFL player performance and somehow knows nothing about football. He could probably take 80% of this board to school on X's and O's at this point.

Agreed, just because he is an owners son/owner doesn't mean he sucks at what he does. Jerrys son is actually pretty decent, and I think we have evidence from the past that Tony was good at the analytics. I don't see an increased involvement of him as a bad thing at all.

---