(12-28-2019, 04:23 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: I’d be OK offering him a 3 year contract commensurate with being part of a committee approach to the run game — which is how I feel he should be used.

Otherwise - i’d probably let him walk.

I do think he’s getting better and can obviously be a productive back. But I still can’t believe the lack of vision at times and I’d like to seek a primary back that sees creases with more ease and fits into them quicker with more agility.

I think we agree basically. Hes had a solid year, he had so many question marks against him before the season but hes grown up a lot this season. I'm quick to criticize but he deserves credit for what he has improved this year. Theres still plenty of room for improvement and he has to kick on from this season and prove you can build an O with him as a key figure. I agree we need to have him as part of a group. Making him a 3 down back every drive has him worn out any time we do hit the redzone.

The risk is if he balls out next year then his price goes up. Whatever we do FO and HC wise will have an impact.

---