(01-04-2020, 02:25 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote:

(01-04-2020, 01:28 AM)p_rushing Wrote: You need to look at the stats. It's too complicated to do it on mobile to post each game, but take away his longest carry of each game and his stats look terrible.

He would be at 726 yards for 2.9 ypc. That is a bust. I would rather have a back who picks up yards on every carry, not one who picks up most of his yards on 1 or 2 carries.

Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk

(01-04-2020, 08:13 AM)SeldomRite Wrote: It's not terrible, he's just clearly not a statistician able to explain what he's talking about. If you want to get an idea of his consistency you can do things like removing outlier runs and calculating a few things. Ideally you'd want your running back to be consistent in getting good yardage on each run, something like 4, 5, 4, 5, 3, 5, 6 for a 4.5 yard average. Not something like 12, -3, 1, 6, 15, -4 for 4.5 average. The first one helps you get to field goal range, the second one gets you a couple of punts.

The below article touches on the unimportance of a strong running game in the modern NFL, and essentially what a stupid draft selection Fournette was.
https://thepowerrank.com/2014/01/10/whic...-playoffs/

Your method would label Barry Sanders a bust. More than 1/3 of his carries were for a loss. I hated the Fournette pick because I wanted McCaffrey, but he’s not a bust.