(02-20-2020, 11:08 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(02-19-2020, 11:59 PM)Upper Wrote: I honestly haven't seen a draftnik say a single good thing about Biadasz so far.

This is Brugler's response to a comment about Biadasz being left off his top 10 IOL list:

Dane Brugler
@Carter Z. He graded out much lower (Early day 3). And the feedback I received from NFL teams is closer to my ranking than many in the media. Direct quote from a scout: "How is media still talking about the Wisconsin kid in the 2nd round?"

He played below average on the better competition he faced in 2019 (Both Ohio State tapes, Michigan, Michigan State)

Who cares what they think, they are wrong a lot.  Sometimes I fell those guys piggy back off of each other when one has an opinion on a player.  I dont watch a a ton of Wis games but the ones a have seen the last couple years he looked pretty dominant.  He also won the award for the best center in college which is pretty good company.  What is your opinion of him?

This is definitely true. It's also understandable in some ways.

Last week Zierlein released his player grades on nfl.com (I usually put more stock in his than anyone else tbh). As usual, there were a few players who he graded significantly higher than others, such as OL Tyre Phillips and TE Devin Asiasi, neither of whom I knew anything about. 

Pretty much the exact next day Matt Miller (Bleacher Report draft guy), released his updated big board, and both of those players had risen like 100+ spots.

You can look at it either way: either they are hacks who just copy the grades of others, or it's more of a case of different perspectives giving them a chance to look at players again and seeing something more. Truth is probably a bit of both.

---